phillip/ingress-intel-total-conversion
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

botguard: work in progress

Browse Source 
response processing - untested
This commit is contained in:
Jon Atkins 2014-09-15 20:01:09 +01:00
parent 09a110386a
commit bbbc3493c9
1 changed files with 49 additions and 19 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

68
code/botguard_interface.js
View File

@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ iitc_bg.process_key = function(key,serverEval) {
// server wants us to eval some code! risky, and impossible to be certain we can do it safely
// however... reports say that it only interacts with the botguard.bg code, so we might be fine just running it
try {
debugger;
eval(serverEval);
} catch(e) {
caught = true;
@ -123,7 +124,8 @@ iitc_bg.process_key = function(key,serverEval) {
};
//convert a method name to the group-[ab]-actions value, or return 'undefined' for no group
//NOTE: the stock code separates the 'in any group' and 'which group' test, but it's cleaner to combine them
iitc_bg.get_method_group = function(method) {
//stock site
//function wd(a) {
@ -144,23 +146,6 @@ iitc_bg.get_method_group = function(method) {
};
// stock site code - called to create the 'c' parameter for each request
//function Cd(a, b) {
// if (-1 == a.gd.indexOf(b)) return "";
// var c = "mxkd", d = wd(b);
// a.ya[d] && 0 < a.ya[d].length && a.ya[d].shift().invoke(function(a) {
// c = a;
// });
// zd(a, d);
// return c;
//}
//... also
//function Sf() {}
//
//Sf.prototype.invoke = function(a) {
// a("dkxm");
//};
// returns the extra parameters to add to any JSON request
@ -213,8 +198,9 @@ iitc_bg.get_request_data = function(method) {
iitc_bg.dummy_botguard = function() {};
iitc_bg.dummy_botguard.prototype.invoke = function(callback) {
debugger;
callback("dkxm");
}
};
iitc_bg.process_queue = function(group) {
@ -246,3 +232,47 @@ iitc_bg.process_queue = function(group) {
}
};
iitc_bg.process_response_params = function(method,data) {
// stock site: response processing
//rd.prototype.Xg = function(a, b) {
// var c = b.target;
// if (Yc(c)) {
// this.Rb.reset();
// var d = a.df, e = JSON.parse($c(c)), f = ud.g(), g = a.getMethodName(), k = e.a, l = e.b, q = e.c;
////e==json response, f==singleton, g==method name, k==response.a, l==response.b, q=responce.c
// -1 != f.gd.indexOf(g) && (l && k && vd(f, l, k), g = wd(g), q && l && xd(f, g, new yd(q, l)), f.ya[g] && 0 != f.ya[g].length || zd(f, g));
// "error" in e && "out of date" == e.error ? (d = J.g(), Ad(!1), d.Ne = !0, Bd("Please refresh for the latest version.")) : n.setTimeout(ma(d, e), 0);
// } else this.Rb.ac = !0, d = a.Ze, u(d) && (e = {
// error: Zc(c) || "unknown",
// respStatus: c.getStatus()
// }, n.setTimeout(ma(d, e), 0));
// d = this.Vd;
// d.oa.remove(c) && d.Wb(c);
//};
var group = iitc_bg.get_method_group(method);
if (group) {
if (data.b && data.a) {
// NOTE: in this case, we *EVAL* the 'data.a' string returned by the server
// there is the risk this is not safe to do in IITC, or will otherwise just fail to run usefully
iitc_bg.process_key(data.b, data.a);
}
if (data.c && data.b) {
iitc_bg.push_queue(group, data.c, data.b);
}
if (iitc_bg.instance_queue[group].length == 0) {
iitc_bg.process_queue(group);
}
}
// finally, the rest of IITC won't expect these strange a/b/c params in the response data
// (e.g. it's pointless to keep in the cache, etc), so clear them
delete data.a;
delete data.b;
delete data.c;
};