website: update faq with two new entries. add a table-of-contents at the top
This commit is contained in:
@ -5,6 +5,69 @@
|
||||
|
||||
$faq = Array (
|
||||
|
||||
'ban' => Array ( "Will I be banned for using IITC?",
|
||||
<<<'END'
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Niantic consider IITC (and any other unofficial software) against the Ingress ToS. However, just because
|
||||
something is against the ToS it doesn't mean Niantic <i>will</i> enforce it.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
However, in early December 2013, many people started to believe Niantic were banning people for using IITC. This is not
|
||||
the case. However, the following events have lead to this belief:
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li>On 27th November 2013, Niantic released a major update of the standard intel site. A couple of days later there were
|
||||
reports of user bans for 'excessive intel use'. A couple of people confirmed it was attempts to use the broken IITC Mobile 0.9
|
||||
that lead to instant bans.</li>
|
||||
<li>About a week later, Niantic made a large batch of user bans 'for ToS violations'. Many users reported their only ToS
|
||||
violation was using IITC - and some said that even IITC hadn't been used. On appeal, many of these bans were
|
||||
reversed - including some confirmed IITC users</li>
|
||||
<li>A week after that and and there were more reports of the same.</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Given that a large number of serious Ingress players use, or have used, IITC, it isn't surprising to find
|
||||
that if Niantic ban someone by mistake, they might have used IITC.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
I believe none of these bans are related to IITC. Rather, Niantic have been working on more aggressive catching of
|
||||
cheaters and other ToS violations - spoofing, bots, multiple accounts, account sharing, etc. These things are inherently
|
||||
hard to detect though, and Niantic are likely to make mistakes sometimes, banning legitimate players.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Note that Niantic have remained completely silent on the reason for any of these bans. This is partly because if they
|
||||
did say what someone had been banned for doing, it might lead to cheaters knowing what they can and can't get away with.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
<b>However</b>: IITC is against the Ingress ToS - so it's sensible to be cautious. Don't publicly share screenshots
|
||||
from IITC in the official Ingress community, or with the official Ingress/NIA G+ accounts.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
END
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
'takedown' => Array ( "Why is IITC still available? Wasn't it sent a takedown notice?",
|
||||
<<<'END'
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
I've seen several comments of the form "IITC was sent a takedown notice, and at this point
|
||||
it moved to Github and kept going". This is not true.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<ol>
|
||||
<li>IITC was started on Github, by <a href="https://github.com/breunigs">Stefan breunigs</a>.</li>
|
||||
<li>Stefan decided to email Niantic, asking if IITC was OK to develop.</li>
|
||||
<li>Niantic replied to this request, stating that any 3rd party software is against the ToS and asked that he delete it from Github.</li>
|
||||
<li>Stefan deleted IITC from Github. However, the nature of Git meant that many other copies of the project already existed.</li>
|
||||
<li>My understanding of the situation, at the time, was that Niantic tolerated IITC. Other software had been sent takedown
|
||||
requests, IITC had not. However, on an explicit request, Niantic felt forced to reply in strict accordance with their terms.</li>
|
||||
<li>I, <a href="https://github.com/jonatkins">Jon Atkins</a>, decided to fix up my copy of IITC, and created this website.</li>
|
||||
<li>Development continued, the website was polished, a G+ page/community were created. Niantic have <i>not</i> contacted me
|
||||
with a takedown request though.</li>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
So, was 'IITC' sent a takedown request? No - this website, and the IITC G+ page, have not been sent such a request.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
END
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
'not-activated' => Array ( "I get a message saying my account isn't activated",
|
||||
<<<'END'
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
@ -43,7 +106,7 @@ why they are drawn curved, see
|
||||
END
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
'uninstall' => Array ( "How do I uninstall/disable IITC or plugins?",
|
||||
'uninstall' => Array ( "IITC Desktop: How do I uninstall/disable IITC or plugins?",
|
||||
<<<'END'
|
||||
This depends on your browser.
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
@ -53,9 +116,10 @@ This depends on your browser.
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
From here you can remove/disable individual plugins or IITC itself.
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
END
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
'mobile-plugins' => Array ( "Is it possible to add external plugins to IITC Mobile?",
|
||||
'mobile-plugins' => Array ( "IITC Mobile: Is it possible to add other plugins to IITC Mobile?",
|
||||
<<<'END'
|
||||
Yes it is!
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
@ -145,7 +209,7 @@ END
|
||||
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# FAQ table of contents
|
||||
print "<ul>";
|
||||
|
||||
foreach ( $faq as $name => $value )
|
||||
@ -153,12 +217,28 @@ foreach ( $faq as $name => $value )
|
||||
$title = $value[0];
|
||||
$body = $value[1];
|
||||
|
||||
print "<li><h4 id=\"$name\">$title</h4>\n";
|
||||
print "$body\n";
|
||||
print "</li>\n";
|
||||
print "<li><a href=\"#$name\">$title</a></li>\n";
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
print "</ul>";
|
||||
|
||||
print "<hr>\n";
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# faq list
|
||||
|
||||
foreach ( $faq as $name => $value )
|
||||
{
|
||||
$title = $value[0];
|
||||
$body = $value[1];
|
||||
|
||||
print "<div class=\"panel panel-default\" id=\"$name\">";
|
||||
print "<div class=\"panel-heading\"><h4>$title</h4></div>";
|
||||
print "<div class=\"panel-body\">$body</div>";
|
||||
print "</div>\n";
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
?>
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user